Growers' Sanctuaries
Supporting growers to get onto the land in ways that free them up to do what they do best – produce high-quality local food for local food systems.
A proposal for a financially viable intervention to help build food security
Amidst unfolding food-security, energy, and nature crises, it’s clear that diagnosis of the problems and their systemic causes isn’t enough — the question is what we can build now, while there is still a window of relative stability and available resources.
In response to that question, we've cooked up an idea for a “build-now, build quickly, build cheap” intervention: modest in scale, but widely replicable, and oriented toward growing the skills and lived practice that will soon matter more than all the oil in Arabia.
We need to strengthen local food systems
Across the UK and beyond, we are facing a growing mismatch between:
- the scale of food-system fragility people can feel approaching
- and the limited number of skilled growers able to get onto the land long enough to develop and sustain high levels of production
If we want stronger local food systems, we need more than good intentions. We need economically creative models that:
- provide pathways onto the land
- support skilled growers to do what they do best
- bring new growers into the pipeline
- and make space for food to be treated as a community asset, not a commodity
Our idea for Growers' Sanctuaries is a proposal in that direction.
The core idea
The basic premise is simple:
If we want resilient local food systems, we need ways to house and support growers — without requiring the farm itself to “win” in the conventional market.
So we've cooked up an approach that can meet this need.
Imagine an 8-acre site designed around one simple priority: supporting a stable team of growers.
In this working model:
- 4 growers live on-site rent-free (in healthy, low-cost, low-impact homes)
- they produce food using agroecological methods
- two glamping pods provide a cross-subsidy that helps make the whole thing viable, while keeping the primary focus on food and training
- a small CSA provides additional income
- the rest of the harvest is gifted locally — explicitly, not as an afterthought
On paper, the numbers are deliberately modest and legible:
- Glamping: 2 pods at £100/night at 60% annual occupancy
- CSA: 30 veg bags/week at £10 for a 40-week season
- Gifting: the remainder of the harvest each week
Rent-free living and a stable, secure income for growers, low-cost veg boxes for the local community and free produce for those most in need, plus integrated nature-recovery through agroecology — what's not to love about that?!
Why housing and supported livelihoods are part of food security
Many would-be growers can't afford housing near land.
Many early-stage growing projects collapse not because the growing is impossible, but because the human side is unsupported:
- unstable income
- insecure/unaffordable accommodation
- burnout
- lack of mentorship
The Growers' Sanctuary model treats housing + training + livelihood as food security infrastructure.
That shift matters, because it moves us away from a charity frame and toward an enabling and resilience frame.
Training new growers: building capacity, not just output
If we want more local food, we need more people who can reliably grow it.
So, a key part of the model is a training layer:
- 2 experienced growers act as mentors
- 2 less experienced growers learn from them
- regular volunteer days bring local people into the work
- periodic homesteading / food-growing courses create wider skills spillover and additional revenue potential
This is a capacity multiplier.
Scalability: replicable, but not infinite
One reason this model is interesting is that it is replicable:
- a clear team structure
- a clear cross-subsidy engine
- a clear public-good output (food + training + gifting)
But it is not infinitely scalable.
Glamping is partly demand-constrained, and demand depends on location, culture, and disposable income. So if we tried to scale this very big in one region, bookings would quickly become a limiting factor.
At the same time, it is not obvious that demand will shrink over time. If energy-expensive foreign holidays become less affordable and less normal, more people may choose local travel — and some will be actively looking for real-world examples of viable alternatives.
So the honest stance is cautious optimism:
- this is not a panacea
- it is a potentially useful financial model
- it will work better in some regions than others
What this contributes
Even when kept modest, this model can deliver multiple outcomes at once:
- local food production that is not purely market-driven
- accessible housing and supported living for growers
- a pathway for training new growers
- a clear mechanism for free food locally as part of the design
- nature restoration through agroecology
- a lived example that helps make one-planet alternatives feel normal and achievable
It's not a silver bullet. But it is a workable contribution: small enough to build, serious enough to matter.
The bigger vision
Land-Based Living Collective (LBLC) exists to help make viable, land-based, low-impact living more possible — not just as ideas, but as things people can actually build and sustain.
The full vision is long-term and multi-layered: land access, natural homes, shared infrastructure, livelihoods, learning, governance, and an intergenerational culture that can hold the work over decades.
The Grower’s Sanctuary sits in that pathway as a stepping stone because it targets one major bottleneck:
getting more growers onto the land — housed, trained, supported — while producing food for local communities and rebuilding ecosystem health.
If we can learn to do that reliably, the larger vision has a foundation.
Closing note
If you’re a grower, a landholder, a funder, or someone involved in food security work, and you want to explore what it would take to pilot one of these sites, you’ll find supporting materials below.
If you want to talk, you can get in touch here.
Supporting materials
Detailed Proposal
Funder One‑Pager
